CAAVS-ONLINE // PRE-ASSIGNMENTS

Submersion in the literature of clinical voice acoustics

Before proceeding, be aware that the manuscripts that can be downloaded from this webpage are copyrighted and not for further dissemination. They are relevant to the topic of clinical assessment of acoustic voice signals and serve as background information and preparation to Phonanium’s CAAVS courses. Click on ‘Full text’ to read and/or download the entire article.

1. Introduction // Practical acoustics in clinical voice assessment: a Praat primer (Maryn, 2017).
   > Published in Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
   > DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/persp2.SIG3.14
   > Full text
2. Room acoustics // Mobile communication devices, ambient noise, and acoustic voice measures (Maryn et al., 2017).
   > Published in Journal of Voice
   > DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.07.023
   > Full text
3. Calibration // Calibration of clinical audio recording and analysis systems for sound intensity measurement (Maryn & Zarowski, 2015).
   > Published in American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
   > DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0082
   > Full text
4. Variability // Perturbation measures of voice: a comparative study between Multi-Dimensional Voice Program and Praat (Maryn et al., 2009).
   > Published in Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica
   > DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000227999
   > Full text
5. Speech tasks // Sustained vowels and continuous speech in the auditory-perceptual evaluation of dysphonia severity (Maryn & Roy, 2012).
   > Published in Jornal da Sociedade Brasileira Fonoaudiologia
   > DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S2179-64912012000200003
   > Full text
6. Validity // Acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: a meta-analysis (Maryn et al., 2009).
   > Published in Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
   > DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3224706
   > Full text
7. Norm-references // A case of specificity: how does the acoustic voice quality index perform in normophonic subjects? (Batthyany et al., 2019).
   > Published in Applied Sciences
   > DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app9122527
   > Full text
8. AVQI v.1 // Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels (Maryn et al., 2010).
   > Published in Journal of Voice
   > DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.12.014
   > Full text
9. AVQI v.2 // Objective dysphonia measures in the program Praat: Smoothed Cepstral Peak Prominence and Acoustic Voice Quality Index (Maryn & Weenink, 2015).
   > Published in Journal of Voice
   > DOI: DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.06.015
   > Full text
10. DSI v.2 // Measuring the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI) in the program Praat (Maryn et al., 2017).
    > Published in Journal of Voice
    > DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.01.002
    > Full text